BSR vs IVV
Beacon Unified Catalyst ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BSR or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 72.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSR | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.09% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $35M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.76% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 30 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +3.81% | +12.24%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.66% | +18.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.32% | +20.98%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.76% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.5%Best | 12.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.7%Best | -18.8% |
| $10,000 over 3.4 years | $12,784 | $19,248Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 72.2% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Beacon Capital Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 17, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 18, 2023 to Sep 9, 2026 (3.4 years).
BSR vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.4 years both funds cover.
BSR vs IVV Performance
Beacon Unified Catalyst ETF (BSR) is an ETF from Beacon Capital Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BSR returned +6.66% while IVV returned +18.61%. Year to date, BSR is up 3.81% versus a gain of 12.24% for IVV.
Over three years, BSR compounded at +7.32% per year against +20.98% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.7% compared with 9.5% for BSR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.7% for BSR and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSR charges 1.09% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $109 vs $3 annually, a gap of $106 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSR currently yields 2.76% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 29 holdings in BSR and 505 in IVV, totalling 99.8% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in BSR and 505 in IVV, against full books of 30 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 29 and 505 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 496 positions BSR does not, 99.3% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 7.98%, AAPL 6.86%, MSFT 5.44%, AMZN 4.01%, GOOGL 3.19%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BSR and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSR or IVV?
BSR has an expense ratio of 1.09% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $106 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BSR or IVV?
Over the past year BSR returned +6.66% vs +18.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BSR or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.7% annualized versus 9.5% for BSR. Worst drawdown: BSR -15.7% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both BSR and IVV?
BSR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSR or IVV?
BSR yields 2.76% while IVV yields 1.06%, so BSR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BSR?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 72.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.