BSR vs VYM
Beacon Unified Catalyst ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSR | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.09% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $35M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.83% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 14 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +4.88% | +15.60% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.93% | +23.48% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.26% | +19.07% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.50% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.6% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Beacon Capital Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 17, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
BSR vs VYM Performance
Beacon Unified Catalyst ETF (BSR) is a ETF from Beacon Capital Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BSR returned +8.93% while VYM returned +23.48%. Year to date, BSR is up 4.88% versus a gain of 15.60% for VYM.
Over three years, BSR compounded at +8.26% per year against +19.07% for VYM. Across the full 3-year window we track, BSR has the edge at +7.95% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 9.6% for BSR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.7% for BSR and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSR charges 1.09% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $109 vs $4 annually, a gap of $105 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSR currently yields 2.83% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
BSR and VYM share 0 holdings out of 630 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSR or VYM?
BSR has an expense ratio of 1.09% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $105 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BSR or VYM?
Over the past year BSR returned +8.93% vs +23.48% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BSR annualized +7.95% vs +7.05% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BSR or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 9.6% for BSR. Worst drawdown: BSR -15.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both BSR and VYM?
BSR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BSR and VYM?
BSR and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 630 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSR or VYM?
BSR yields 2.83% while VYM yields 2.24%, so BSR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.