BSV vs VIPIX
Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF vs Vanguard Inflation Protected Securities Fund Insti Shs
Which is better, BSV or VIPIX?
Short Term Bond against Inflation Protection.
BSV has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSV | VIPIX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.07% |
| AUM | $45.6B | $12.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.01% | 5.21% |
| Holdings | 3,205 | 81 |
| YTD Price Return | -3.02% | -2.25% |
| 1Y Price Return | -3.23% | -5.38% |
| 3Y Price Return (annualized) | +0.57% | -0.40% |
| 5Y Price Return (annualized) | -1.40% | -4.97% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.9%Best | 6.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -9.7%Best | -24.2% |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Style | Short Term Bond | Inflation Protection |
| Inception | Apr 3, 2007 | Dec 12, 2003 |
Not shown on this pair: $10,000 over 5 years, Top 10 Weight.
A price return is not the return of a fund that pays its income out. The coupon or distribution never appears in the price, so the return rows carry no winner here. BSV currently yields 4.01% and VIPIX 5.21%.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 24, 2021 to Sep 22, 2026 (5 years).
BSV vs VIPIX Performance
Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF (BSV) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Inflation Protected Securities Fund Insti Shs (VIPIX) is a mutual fund from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BSV's price moved -3.23% and VIPIX's -5.38%, before the income each one paid out.
Over three years, BSV compounded at +0.57% per year against -0.40% for VIPIX; over five years the annualized figures are -1.40% and -4.97% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VIPIX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.6% compared with 2.9% for BSV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.7% for BSV and -24.2% for VIPIX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSV charges 0.03% per year while VIPIX charges 0.07%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $7 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSV currently yields 4.01% against 5.21% for VIPIX.
Structure and taxes
VIPIX is a mutual fund and BSV is an ETF. A mutual fund prices once a day at net asset value and may carry a purchase minimum. An ETF trades through the day at whatever the market pays for it.
In a taxable account the difference that usually matters is distributions. An ETF can meet redemptions in kind, so it rarely has to sell holdings and rarely passes a capital gain to the people who held it; a mutual fund that sells holdings to meet redemptions can distribute a realised gain at year end to everyone still in the fund, whether or not they sold anything themselves. In a tax-deferred account that difference largely disappears. Both are descriptions of how the two wrappers work, not a recommendation.
Tax-loss harvesting works on either wrapper.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1,013 holdings in BSV and 52 in VIPIX, totalling 63.3% and 74.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1,013 positions we hold weights for in BSV and 52 in VIPIX, against full books of 3,205 and 81.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BSV and VIPIX you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSV or VIPIX?
BSV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VIPIX charges 0.07%. BSV is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, BSV or VIPIX?
VIPIX has been the more volatile fund at 6.6% annualized versus 2.9% for BSV. Worst drawdown: BSV -9.7% vs VIPIX -24.2%.
Should I hold both BSV and VIPIX?
BSV and VIPIX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSV or VIPIX?
BSV yields 4.01% while VIPIX yields 5.21%, so VIPIX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is it better to hold VIPIX or BSV in a taxable account?
BSV is an ETF and VIPIX is a mutual fund. An ETF can meet redemptions in kind, so it rarely distributes a capital gain to the people holding it. A mutual fund that sells holdings to meet redemptions can pass a realised gain to every holder at year end. In a tax-deferred account that difference largely disappears. This is information, not a recommendation.
Is VIPIX better than BSV?
BSV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.