BTF vs VTI
CoinShares Bitcoin and Ether ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BTF | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.27% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $14M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 247.08% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -36.31% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | -53.26% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.86% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 59.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -77.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Valkyrie Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
BTF vs VTI Performance
CoinShares Bitcoin and Ether ETF (BTF) is a ETF from Valkyrie Funds and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BTF returned -53.26% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, BTF is down 36.31% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Over three years, BTF compounded at +10.86% per year against +21.17% for VTI. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.13% annualized vs -9.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BTF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 59.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -77.5% for BTF and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BTF charges 1.27% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $127 vs $3 annually, a gap of $124 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BTF currently yields 247.08% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BTF and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BTF or VTI?
BTF has an expense ratio of 1.27% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $124 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BTF or VTI?
Over the past year BTF returned -53.26% vs +23.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), BTF annualized -9.35% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BTF or VTI?
BTF has been the more volatile fund at 59.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BTF -77.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BTF and VTI?
BTF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BTF and VTI?
BTF and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BTF or VTI?
BTF yields 247.08% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BTF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.