BTF vs VXUS
BTF vs VXUS
CoinShares Bitcoin and Ether ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BTF | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.27% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $14M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 247.08% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -35.49% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | -49.98% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.42% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 59.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -77.5% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Valkyrie Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
BTF vs VXUS Performance
CoinShares Bitcoin and Ether ETF (BTF) is a ETF from Valkyrie Funds and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BTF returned -49.98% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, BTF is down 35.49% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, BTF compounded at +10.42% per year against +19.27% for VXUS. Across the full 5-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.86% annualized vs -9.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BTF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 59.7% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -77.5% for BTF and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.26. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BTF charges 1.27% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $127 vs $5 annually, a gap of $122 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BTF currently yields 247.08% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
BTF and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7862 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BTF or VXUS?
BTF has an expense ratio of 1.27% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $122 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BTF or VXUS?
Over the past year BTF returned -49.98% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), BTF annualized -9.13% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BTF or VXUS?
BTF has been the more volatile fund at 59.7% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: BTF -77.5% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both BTF and VXUS?
BTF and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.26, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BTF and VXUS?
BTF and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7862 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BTF or VXUS?
BTF yields 247.08% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so BTF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.