BTFL vs IVV
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long BITF ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BTFL or IVV?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BTFL led over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BTFL | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.31% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 6 | 508 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3486232.1% | 15.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | - | -33.9% |
| $10,000 over 11.8 years | $617,822Best | $38,938 |
| Fund Family | Defiance ETFs, LLC | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 29, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 147 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. BTFL has data through Apr 24, 2026 and IVV through Sep 18, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 11.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 14, 2014 to Apr 24, 2026 (11.8 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BTFL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 3486232.1% compared with 15.0% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.02. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BTFL charges 1.31% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $131 vs $3 annually, a gap of $128 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BTFL currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in BTFL and 490 in IVV, totalling 17.2% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 213 days apart, BTFL as of Jan 30, 2026 and IVV as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in BTFL and 490 in IVV, against full books of 6 and 508.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BTFL and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BTFL or IVV?
BTFL has an expense ratio of 1.31% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $128 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, BTFL or IVV?
BTFL has been the more volatile fund at 3486232.1% annualized versus 15.0% for IVV.
Should I hold both BTFL and IVV?
BTFL and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.02, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BTFL or IVV?
BTFL yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BTFL?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BTFL led over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.