BTFL vs IVV
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long BITF ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BTFL delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BTFL | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.31% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +109.50% | +14.50% | |
| 1Y Return | +147.24% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3486232.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Defiance ETFs, LLC | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 29, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
BTFL vs IVV Performance
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long BITF ETF (BTFL) is a ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BTFL returned +147.24% while IVV returned +22.02%. Year to date, BTFL is up 109.50% versus a gain of 14.50% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BTFL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 3486232.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for BTFL and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.02. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BTFL charges 1.31% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $131 vs $3 annually, a gap of $128 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BTFL currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BTFL and IVV share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BTFL or IVV?
BTFL has an expense ratio of 1.31% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $128 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BTFL or IVV?
Over the past year BTFL returned +147.24% vs +22.02% for IVV, so BTFL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), BTFL annualized +41.83% vs +7.07% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BTFL or IVV?
BTFL has been the more volatile fund at 3486232.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BTFL -100.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BTFL and IVV?
BTFL and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.02, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BTFL and IVV?
BTFL and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BTFL or IVV?
BTFL yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.