BTFL vs VTI
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long BITF ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BTFL delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BTFL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.31% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +109.50% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +147.24% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3486232.1% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Defiance ETFs, LLC | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 29, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
BTFL vs VTI Performance
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long BITF ETF (BTFL) is a ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BTFL returned +147.24% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, BTFL is up 109.50% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BTFL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 3486232.1% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for BTFL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.02. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BTFL charges 1.31% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $131 vs $3 annually, a gap of $128 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BTFL currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BTFL and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BTFL or VTI?
BTFL has an expense ratio of 1.31% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $128 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BTFL or VTI?
Over the past year BTFL returned +147.24% vs +22.43% for VTI, so BTFL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), BTFL annualized +41.83% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BTFL or VTI?
BTFL has been the more volatile fund at 3486232.1% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BTFL -100.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BTFL and VTI?
BTFL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.02, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BTFL and VTI?
BTFL and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BTFL or VTI?
BTFL yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.