BTFL vs QQQ
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long BITF ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. BTFL delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BTFL | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.31% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $2M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +109.50% | +19.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +147.24% | +26.75% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3486232.1% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Defiance ETFs, LLC | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 29, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BTFL vs QQQ Performance
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long BITF ETF (BTFL) is a ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BTFL returned +147.24% while QQQ returned +26.75%. Year to date, BTFL is up 109.50% versus a gain of 19.68% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BTFL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 3486232.1% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for BTFL and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.05. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BTFL charges 1.31% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $131 vs $18 annually, a gap of $113 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BTFL currently yields 0.00% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BTFL and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 104 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BTFL or QQQ?
BTFL has an expense ratio of 1.31% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $113 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BTFL or QQQ?
Over the past year BTFL returned +147.24% vs +26.75% for QQQ, so BTFL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), BTFL annualized +41.83% vs +13.15% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BTFL or QQQ?
BTFL has been the more volatile fund at 3486232.1% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: BTFL -100.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BTFL and QQQ?
BTFL and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.05, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BTFL and QQQ?
BTFL and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 104 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BTFL or QQQ?
BTFL yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.