BUG vs QQQ
Global X Cybersecurity ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, BUG or QQQ?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUG | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $1.6B | $486.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.03% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 34 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +39.06%Best | +17.54% |
| 1Y Return | +22.99% | +25.59%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.93% | +24.63%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.27% | +14.18%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.5% | 20.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -41.7% | -35.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,928 | $19,407Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 61.0% | 46.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 25, 2019 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 31, 2019 to Sep 4, 2026 (6.8 years).
BUG vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.8 years both funds cover.
BUG vs QQQ Performance
Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BUG returned +22.99% while QQQ returned +25.59%. Year to date, BUG is up 39.06% versus a gain of 17.54% for QQQ.
Over three years, BUG compounded at +17.93% per year against +24.63% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +5.27% and +14.18% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +21.39% annualized vs +15.83%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BUG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.5% compared with 20.7% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.7% for BUG and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUG charges 0.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $18 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUG currently yields 0.03% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
23.4% of BUG's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 2.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings BUG also owns.
BUG and QQQ share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in BUG and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 34 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 93 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for BUG (94.8% of the fund), and 17 for BUG that do not appear in QQQ (64.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
23.4% of BUG is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUG or QQQ?
BUG has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BUG or QQQ?
Over the past year BUG returned +22.99% vs +25.59% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), BUG annualized +15.83% vs +21.39% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BUG or QQQ?
BUG has been the more volatile fund at 28.5% annualized versus 20.7% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: BUG -41.7% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both BUG and QQQ?
BUG and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BUG and QQQ?
23.4% of BUG's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 2.8% of QQQ's is in holdings BUG also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in BUG and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUG or QQQ?
BUG yields 0.03% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than BUG?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.