BUG vs VOO
Global X Cybersecurity ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. BUG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.6B | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.03% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 34 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +44.84% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.51% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.22% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.20% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.4% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -41.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 25, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BUG vs VOO Performance
Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BUG returned +30.51% while VOO returned +21.79%. Year to date, BUG is up 44.84% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Over three years, BUG compounded at +22.22% per year against +22.19% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.20% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, BUG has the edge at +16.67% annualized vs +13.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BUG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.4% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.7% for BUG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUG charges 0.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUG currently yields 0.03% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUG or VOO?
BUG has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BUG or VOO?
Over the past year BUG returned +30.51% vs +21.79% for VOO, so BUG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), BUG annualized +16.67% vs +13.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BUG or VOO?
BUG has been the more volatile fund at 28.4% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: BUG -41.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BUG and VOO?
BUG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BUG and VOO?
BUG and VOO share 2 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 530 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUG or VOO?
BUG yields 0.03% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.