BUG vs VOO
Global X Cybersecurity ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BUG or VOO?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. BUG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, VOO over 5Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUG | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.6B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.03% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 34 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +58.39%Best | +13.31% |
| 1Y Return | +33.84%Best | +17.07% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.19%Best | +22.72% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.57% | +13.19%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.4% | 16.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -41.7% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,085 | $18,580Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 62.2% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 25, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 31, 2019 to Sep 23, 2026 (6.9 years).
BUG vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.9 years both funds cover.
BUG vs VOO Performance
Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BUG returned +33.84% while VOO returned +17.07%. Year to date, BUG is up 58.39% versus a gain of 13.31% for VOO.
Over three years, BUG compounded at +25.19% per year against +22.72% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.57% and +13.19% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, BUG has the edge at +17.90% annualized vs +15.77%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BUG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.4% compared with 16.8% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.7% for BUG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUG charges 0.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUG currently yields 0.03% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
31.4% of BUG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.9% of VOO's money is in holdings BUG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
5 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in BUG and 494 in VOO, against full books of 34 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 482 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for BUG (98.2% of the fund), and 15 for BUG that do not appear in VOO (56.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
31.4% of BUG is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUG or VOO?
BUG has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BUG or VOO?
Over the past year BUG returned +33.84% vs +17.07% for VOO, so BUG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), BUG annualized +17.90% vs +15.77% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BUG or VOO?
BUG has been the more volatile fund at 28.4% annualized versus 16.8% for VOO. Worst drawdown: BUG -41.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BUG and VOO?
BUG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BUG and VOO?
31.4% of BUG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.9% of VOO's is in holdings BUG also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in BUG and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUG or VOO?
BUG yields 0.03% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than BUG?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. BUG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, VOO over 5Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.