BUG vs VTI
Global X Cybersecurity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BUG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.6B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.03% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 34 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +44.84% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.51% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.22% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.20% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.4% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -41.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 25, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
BUG vs VTI Performance
Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BUG returned +30.51% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, BUG is up 44.84% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, BUG compounded at +22.22% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.20% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, BUG has the edge at +16.67% annualized vs +8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BUG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.4% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.7% for BUG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUG charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUG currently yields 0.03% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BUG and VTI share 14 holdings out of 2800 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUG or VTI?
BUG has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BUG or VTI?
Over the past year BUG returned +30.51% vs +22.43% for VTI, so BUG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), BUG annualized +16.67% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BUG or VTI?
BUG has been the more volatile fund at 28.4% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BUG -41.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BUG and VTI?
BUG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BUG and VTI?
BUG and VTI share 14 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2800 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUG or VTI?
BUG yields 0.03% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.