BUSM vs VXUS
EA Bridgeway Ultra-Small Company Market ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, BUSM or VXUS?
Small Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. BUSM led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUSM | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.73% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $124M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 39 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | -1.31% | +12.65%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +20.06% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.43% |
| Fund Family | Bridgeway Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 24, 2026 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BUSM vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BUSM vs VXUS Performance
EA Bridgeway Ultra-Small Company Market ETF (BUSM) is an ETF from Bridgeway Funds and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, BUSM is down 1.31% versus a gain of 12.65% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUSM charges 0.73% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $73 vs $5 annually, a gap of $68 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUSM currently yields 0.00% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 38 holdings in BUSM and 8,082 in VXUS, totalling 99.9% and 88.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in BUSM and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 39 and 8,747.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 38 and 8,082 positions we hold weights for.
VXUS holds 35 positions BUSM does not, 2.3% of the fund.
Largest: MKL 0.76%, SHEL 0.57%, VWO 0.11%, JD 0.09%, ALC 0.08%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BUSM and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUSM or VXUS?
BUSM has an expense ratio of 0.73% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $68 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUSM or VXUS?
BUSM yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than BUSM?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. BUSM led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.