BUSM vs IVV
EA Bridgeway Ultra-Small Company Market ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BUSM or IVV?
Small Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BUSM led over 1Y. BUSM is less concentrated, with 5.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUSM | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.73% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $119M | $882.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 585 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -2.06% | +12.76%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +15.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.95% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.54% |
| Top 10 Weight | 5.9%Best | 38.1% |
| Fund Family | Bridgeway Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 24, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BUSM vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BUSM vs IVV Performance
EA Bridgeway Ultra-Small Company Market ETF (BUSM) is an ETF from Bridgeway Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, BUSM is down 2.06% versus a gain of 12.76% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUSM charges 0.73% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $73 vs $3 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUSM currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
0.3% of BUSM's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 541 positions we hold weights for in BUSM and 505 in IVV, against full books of 585 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 496 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for BUSM (99.2% of the fund), and 534 for BUSM that do not appear in IVV (97.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BUSM | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AOSAo Smith Corp. | 0.29% | 0.01% | 0.28% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BUSM and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUSM or IVV?
BUSM has an expense ratio of 0.73% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $70 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUSM or IVV?
BUSM yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BUSM?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BUSM led over 1Y. BUSM is less concentrated, with 5.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.