BWOW vs VTI

BWOW vs VTI

Which is better, BWOW or VTI?

Single Currency against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio.

Lower Fees: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBWOWVTI
Expense Ratio0.34%0.03%Best
AUM$554,256$689.2B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.06%
Holdings23,524
Fund FamilyBitwiseVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleSingle CurrencyLarge Cap Blend
InceptionNov 25, 2025May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

The two price series end 16 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. BWOW has data through Oct 14, 2026 and VTI through Oct 30, 2026.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BWOW charges 0.34% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $34 vs $3 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BWOW currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BWOW and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BWOWVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BWOW or VTI?

BWOW has an expense ratio of 0.34% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which pays a higher dividend, BWOW or VTI?

BWOW yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than BWOW?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.