BZQ vs VTI
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BZQ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.94% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -24.09% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | -48.63% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -24.27% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -27.22% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 58.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 16, 2009 | May 24, 2001 |
BZQ vs VTI Performance
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped (BZQ) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BZQ returned -48.63% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, BZQ is down 24.09% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, BZQ compounded at -24.27% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -27.22% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs -29.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BZQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 58.3% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.8% for BZQ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BZQ charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BZQ currently yields 6.94% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BZQ or VTI?
BZQ has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BZQ or VTI?
Over the past year BZQ returned -48.63% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), BZQ annualized -29.11% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BZQ or VTI?
BZQ has been the more volatile fund at 58.3% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BZQ -99.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BZQ and VTI?
BZQ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, BZQ or VTI?
BZQ yields 6.94% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BZQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.