BZQ vs VOO
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BZQ | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.94% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -19.87% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | -45.80% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -24.10% | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -26.35% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 58.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 16, 2009 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BZQ vs VOO Performance
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped (BZQ) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BZQ returned -45.80% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, BZQ is down 19.87% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, BZQ compounded at -24.10% per year against +21.79% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -26.35% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.45% annualized vs -28.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BZQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 58.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.8% for BZQ and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.44. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BZQ charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BZQ currently yields 6.94% against 1.08% for VOO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BZQ or VOO?
BZQ has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BZQ or VOO?
Over the past year BZQ returned -45.80% vs +20.92% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), BZQ annualized -28.89% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BZQ or VOO?
BZQ has been the more volatile fund at 58.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: BZQ -99.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BZQ and VOO?
BZQ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.44, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, BZQ or VOO?
BZQ yields 6.94% while VOO yields 1.08%, so BZQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.