BZQ vs VOO
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BZQ or VOO?
Trading-Inverse Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BZQ | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 6.73% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 5 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -37.77% | +11.55%Best |
| 1Y Return | -50.99% | +17.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -28.31% | +20.71%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -29.83% | +12.80%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 58.1% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | - | -34.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $1,701 | $18,262Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Inverse Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 16, 2009 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 10, 2026 (16 years).
BZQ vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
BZQ vs VOO Performance
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped (BZQ) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BZQ returned -50.99% while VOO returned +17.54%. Year to date, BZQ is down 37.77% versus a gain of 11.55% for VOO.
Over three years, BZQ compounded at -28.31% per year against +20.71% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -29.83% and +12.80% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.35% annualized vs -27.05%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BZQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 58.1% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.44. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BZQ charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BZQ currently yields 6.73% against 1.04% for VOO.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BZQ and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BZQ or VOO?
BZQ has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BZQ or VOO?
Over the past year BZQ returned -50.99% vs +17.54% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), BZQ annualized -27.05% vs +13.35% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BZQ or VOO?
BZQ has been the more volatile fund at 58.1% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO.
Should I hold both BZQ and VOO?
BZQ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.44, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BZQ or VOO?
BZQ yields 6.73% while VOO yields 1.04%, so BZQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than BZQ?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.