BZQ vs VYM
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BZQ | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $2M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.10% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -18.67% | +16.78% | |
| 1Y Return | -42.85% | +24.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -22.46% | +18.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -24.42% | +12.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 58.4% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 16, 2009 | Nov 10, 2006 |
BZQ vs VYM Performance
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped (BZQ) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BZQ returned -42.85% while VYM returned +24.43%. Year to date, BZQ is down 18.67% versus a gain of 16.78% for VYM.
Over three years, BZQ compounded at -22.46% per year against +18.60% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -24.42% and +12.30% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.11% annualized vs -28.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BZQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 58.4% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.8% for BZQ and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.51. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BZQ charges 0.95% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $4 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BZQ currently yields 6.10% against 2.86% for VYM.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BZQ or VYM?
BZQ has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $91 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BZQ or VYM?
Over the past year BZQ returned -42.85% vs +24.43% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), BZQ annualized -28.85% vs +7.11% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BZQ or VYM?
BZQ has been the more volatile fund at 58.4% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: BZQ -99.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both BZQ and VYM?
BZQ and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of -0.51, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, BZQ or VYM?
BZQ yields 6.10% while VYM yields 2.86%, so BZQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.