CAM vs VYM
AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, CAM or VYM?
VYM has been ahead.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CAM | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.27% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $1.2B | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.77% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 447 | 613 |
| YTD Return | -0.62% | +11.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +0.64% | +15.34%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.22% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.30% |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 3, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
CAM vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CAM vs VYM Performance
AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF (CAM) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CAM returned +0.64% while VYM returned +15.34%. Year to date, CAM is down 0.62% versus a gain of 11.35% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CAM charges 0.27% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $27 vs $4 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CAM currently yields 2.77% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 85 holdings in CAM and 557 in VYM, totalling 25.3% and 99.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 85 positions we hold weights for in CAM and 557 in VYM, against full books of 447 and 613.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CAM and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CAM or VYM?
CAM has an expense ratio of 0.27% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $23 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CAM or VYM?
Over the past year CAM returned +0.64% vs +15.34% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CAM or VYM?
CAM yields 2.77% while VYM yields 2.22%, so CAM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than CAM?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.