CEFA vs VYM
Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-US ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, CEFA or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. CEFA is less concentrated, with 16.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CEFA | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $63M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.60% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 372 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +10.37% | +12.87%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.98% | +17.25%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.17% | +17.66%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.21% | +11.98%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.4% | 13.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -32.0% | -15.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,164 | $17,608Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 16.7%Best | 26.1% |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 22, 2020 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 24, 2020 to Sep 15, 2026 (6.2 years).
CEFA vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.2 years both funds cover.
CEFA vs VYM Performance
Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-US ETF (CEFA) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CEFA returned +15.98% while VYM returned +17.25%. Year to date, CEFA is up 10.37% versus a gain of 12.87% for VYM.
Over three years, CEFA compounded at +17.17% per year against +17.66% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +7.21% and +11.98% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +15.42% annualized vs +10.91%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CEFA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.4% compared with 13.8% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.0% for CEFA and -15.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CEFA charges 0.35% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $4 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CEFA currently yields 2.60% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 354 holdings in CEFA and 557 in VYM, totalling 99.3% and 99.2% of the two funds. That is not enough of VYM to divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.
1 positions in common, counted across the 354 positions we hold weights for in CEFA and 557 in VYM, against full books of 372 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 527 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for CEFA (97.1% of the fund), and 15 for CEFA that do not appear in VYM (7.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CEFA | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FIBKFirst Intst Bancsyst Inc Cl A | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CEFA and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CEFA or VYM?
CEFA has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CEFA or VYM?
Over the past year CEFA returned +15.98% vs +17.25% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), CEFA annualized +10.91% vs +15.42% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CEFA or VYM?
CEFA has been the more volatile fund at 16.4% annualized versus 13.8% for VYM. Worst drawdown: CEFA -32.0% vs VYM -15.8%.
Should I hold both CEFA and VYM?
CEFA and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CEFA or VYM?
CEFA yields 2.60% while VYM yields 2.22%, so CEFA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than CEFA?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. CEFA is less concentrated, with 16.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.