CGNG vs VXUS
Capital Group New Geography Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGNG | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.64% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $2.7B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.59% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 467 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +11.94% | +14.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.65% | +27.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.14% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
CGNG vs VXUS Performance
Capital Group New Geography Equity ETF (CGNG) is a ETF from Capital Group (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CGNG returned +26.65% while VXUS returned +27.24%. Year to date, CGNG is up 11.94% versus a gain of 14.07% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.7% for CGNG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.9% for CGNG and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGNG charges 0.64% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $64 vs $5 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGNG currently yields 0.59% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
CGNG and VXUS share 131 holdings out of 7964 unique holdings combined, representing a 11.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGNG or VXUS?
CGNG has an expense ratio of 0.64% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $59 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CGNG or VXUS?
Over the past year CGNG returned +26.65% vs +27.24% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CGNG annualized +19.86% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CGNG or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.7% for CGNG. Worst drawdown: CGNG -15.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both CGNG and VXUS?
CGNG and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between CGNG and VXUS?
CGNG and VXUS share 131 common holdings with a 11.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7964 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGNG or VXUS?
CGNG yields 0.59% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.