CGNG vs VTI
Capital Group New Geography Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, CGNG or VTI?
CGNG has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CGNG led over 1Y and the full window. CGNG is less concentrated, with 30.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGNG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.64% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $3.1B | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.59% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 244 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +14.61% | +14.72%Best |
| 1Y Return | +19.80%Best | +16.82% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.93% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.78% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3% | 12.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -15.9%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $15,096Best | $14,701 |
| Top 10 Weight | 30.8%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 27, 2024 to Oct 6, 2026 (2.3 years).
CGNG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
CGNG vs VTI Performance
Capital Group New Geography Equity ETF (CGNG) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CGNG returned +19.80% while VTI returned +16.82%. Year to date, CGNG is up 14.61% versus a gain of 14.72% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CGNG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.3% compared with 12.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.9% for CGNG and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGNG charges 0.64% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $64 vs $3 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGNG currently yields 0.59% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
12.7% of CGNG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 37.3% of VTI's money is in holdings CGNG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
33 positions in common, counted across the 241 positions we hold weights for in CGNG and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 244 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,117 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for CGNG (60.1% of the fund), and 10 for CGNG that do not appear in VTI (5.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGNG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 1.39% | 6.40% | 5.01% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 0.15% | 6.29% | 6.14% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.26% | 4.79% | 3.53% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.52% | 2.56% | 1.04% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 1.11% | 2.90% | 1.79% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 0.50% | 2.31% | 1.81% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 0.95% | 1.70% | 0.75% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 0.31% | 1.35% | 1.04% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 0.26% | 1.29% | 1.03% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 0.09% | 1.22% | 1.13% |
37.3% of VTI is already inside CGNG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGNG or VTI?
CGNG has an expense ratio of 0.64% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $61 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGNG or VTI?
Over the past year CGNG returned +19.80% vs +16.82% for VTI, so CGNG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CGNG annualized +19.61% vs +18.24% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGNG or VTI?
CGNG has been the more volatile fund at 13.3% annualized versus 12.0% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CGNG -15.9% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both CGNG and VTI?
CGNG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGNG and VTI?
37.3% of VTI's money is in holdings CGNG also owns. 37.3% of VTI's is in holdings CGNG also owns. They hold 33 positions in common, counted across the 241 positions we hold weights for in CGNG and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGNG or VTI?
CGNG yields 0.59% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than CGNG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CGNG led over 1Y and the full window. CGNG is less concentrated, with 30.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.