CIL vs IVV
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, CIL or IVV?
Each has led over a different period.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. CIL led over 1Y, IVV over the full window. CIL is less concentrated, with 3.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CIL | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $31M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.51% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 513 | 508 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.0% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -46.1% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 10.5 years | $21,748 | $36,253Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 3.7%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 20, 2015 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 216 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. CIL has data through Feb 4, 2026 and IVV through Sep 8, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 10.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 20, 2015 to Feb 4, 2026 (10.5 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CIL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.1% for CIL and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CIL charges 0.45% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CIL currently yields 2.51% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
0.4% of CIL's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.2% of IVV's money is in holdings CIL also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
The two holdings books were reported 309 days apart, CIL as of Sep 30, 2025 and IVV as of Aug 5, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
2 positions in common, counted across the 503 positions we hold weights for in CIL and 504 in IVV, against full books of 513 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 492 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for CIL (99.1% of the fund), and 5 for CIL that do not appear in IVV (1.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CIL and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CIL or IVV?
CIL has an expense ratio of 0.45% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, CIL or IVV?
CIL has been the more volatile fund at 29.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: CIL -46.1% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both CIL and IVV?
CIL and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CIL or IVV?
CIL yields 2.51% while IVV yields 1.10%, so CIL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than CIL?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. CIL led over 1Y, IVV over the full window. CIL is less concentrated, with 3.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.