CIL vs VXUS
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. CIL delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CIL | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $31M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.51% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 513 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +4.54% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.71% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.45% | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.56% | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.1% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 20, 2015 | Jan 26, 2011 |
CIL vs VXUS Performance
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CIL returned +34.71% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, CIL is up 4.54% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Over three years, CIL compounded at +16.45% per year against +20.34% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +9.56% and +9.38% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, CIL has the edge at +7.68% annualized vs +4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CIL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.0% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.1% for CIL and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CIL charges 0.45% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $5 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CIL currently yields 2.51% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
CIL and VXUS share 350 holdings out of 8023 unique holdings combined, representing a 28.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CIL or VXUS?
CIL has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $40 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CIL or VXUS?
Over the past year CIL returned +34.71% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so CIL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), CIL annualized +7.68% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CIL or VXUS?
CIL has been the more volatile fund at 29.0% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: CIL -46.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both CIL and VXUS?
CIL and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CIL and VXUS?
CIL and VXUS share 350 common holdings with a 28.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8023 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CIL or VXUS?
CIL yields 2.51% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.