CIL vs VOO
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. CIL delivered stronger 1-year returns. CIL offers more diversification with 513 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CIL | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $31M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.51% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 513 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +4.54% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.71% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.45% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.56% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.0% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 20, 2015 | Sep 7, 2010 |
CIL vs VOO Performance
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CIL returned +34.71% while VOO returned +21.79%. Year to date, CIL is up 4.54% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Over three years, CIL compounded at +16.45% per year against +22.19% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.56% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.59% annualized vs +7.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CIL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.0% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.1% for CIL and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CIL charges 0.45% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CIL currently yields 2.51% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
CIL and VOO share 1 holdings out of 1008 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CIL | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADP | 0.22% | 0.14% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CIL or VOO?
CIL has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CIL or VOO?
Over the past year CIL returned +34.71% vs +21.79% for VOO, so CIL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), CIL annualized +7.68% vs +13.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CIL or VOO?
CIL has been the more volatile fund at 29.0% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: CIL -46.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both CIL and VOO?
CIL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CIL and VOO?
CIL and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1008 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CIL or VOO?
CIL yields 2.51% while VOO yields 1.08%, so CIL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.