CLIX vs QQQ
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CLIX | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $6M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.53% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 30 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +0.61% | +16.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.52% | +26.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.55% | +25.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.82% | +14.78% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.6% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -73.2% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 14, 2017 | Mar 10, 1999 |
CLIX vs QQQ Performance
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) is a ETF from ProShares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CLIX returned +8.52% while QQQ returned +26.23%. Year to date, CLIX is up 0.61% versus a gain of 16.23% for QQQ.
Over three years, CLIX compounded at +20.55% per year against +25.75% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -1.82% and +14.78% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.02% annualized vs +4.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 24.6% for CLIX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -73.2% for CLIX and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CLIX charges 0.65% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $18 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CLIX currently yields 0.53% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
CLIX and QQQ share 3 holdings out of 121 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CLIX or QQQ?
CLIX has an expense ratio of 0.65% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CLIX or QQQ?
Over the past year CLIX returned +8.52% vs +26.23% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), CLIX annualized +4.96% vs +13.02% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CLIX or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 24.6% for CLIX. Worst drawdown: CLIX -73.2% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both CLIX and QQQ?
CLIX and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CLIX and QQQ?
CLIX and QQQ share 3 common holdings with a 5.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 121 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CLIX or QQQ?
CLIX yields 0.53% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so CLIX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.