CLIX vs QQQ

CLIX vs QQQ

Which is better, CLIX or QQQ?

Long-Short Strategy against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCLIXQQQ
Expense Ratio0.65%0.18%Best
AUM$6M$506.1B
Dividend Yield0.50%0.42%
Holdings30321
Volatility (annualized)24.4%19.9%Best
Max Drawdown-73.2%-35.1%Best
$10,000 over 8.9 years$14,770$49,882Best
Fund FamilyProSharesInvesco (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleLong-Short StrategyLarge Cap Growth
InceptionNov 14, 2017Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.

The two price series end 18 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. CLIX has data through Oct 12, 2026 and QQQ through Oct 30, 2026.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 8.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 16, 2017 to Oct 12, 2026 (8.9 years).

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

CLIX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.4% compared with 19.9% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -73.2% for CLIX and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CLIX charges 0.65% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $18 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CLIX currently yields 0.50% against 0.42% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

QQQ already in CLIX4.7%

At least 4.7% of QQQ's money is in holdings CLIX also owns.

Stated as a floor: for CLIX, our book for it covers 83.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

QQQ and CLIX share little of their money.

3 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in CLIX and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 30 and 321.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CLIXWeight in QQQDifference
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc20.27%4.07%16.20%
PDD:IEPdd Holdings Inc.3.67%0.22%3.45%
MELIMercadolibre Inc3.28%0.37%2.91%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of CLIX and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

CLIXQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CLIX or QQQ?

CLIX has an expense ratio of 0.65% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which is riskier, CLIX or QQQ?

CLIX has been the more volatile fund at 24.4% annualized versus 19.9% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: CLIX -73.2% vs QQQ -35.1%.

Should I hold both CLIX and QQQ?

CLIX and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between CLIX and QQQ?

At least 4.7% of QQQ's money is in holdings CLIX also owns. Our book for CLIX is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in CLIX and 101 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, CLIX or QQQ?

CLIX yields 0.50% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so CLIX currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than CLIX?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.