CLIX vs VYM
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CLIX | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $6M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.53% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 30 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | -2.34% | +15.75% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.55% | +23.85% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.40% | +19.14% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -3.07% | +12.45% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.6% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -73.2% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 14, 2017 | Nov 10, 2006 |
CLIX vs VYM Performance
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CLIX returned +3.55% while VYM returned +23.85%. Year to date, CLIX is down 2.34% versus a gain of 15.75% for VYM.
Over three years, CLIX compounded at +19.40% per year against +19.14% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -3.07% and +12.45% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs +4.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CLIX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.6% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -73.2% for CLIX and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CLIX charges 0.65% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $4 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CLIX currently yields 0.53% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CLIX or VYM?
CLIX has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $61 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CLIX or VYM?
Over the past year CLIX returned +3.55% vs +23.85% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), CLIX annualized +4.61% vs +7.06% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CLIX or VYM?
CLIX has been the more volatile fund at 24.6% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: CLIX -73.2% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both CLIX and VYM?
CLIX and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CLIX and VYM?
CLIX and VYM share 2 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 623 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CLIX or VYM?
CLIX yields 0.53% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.