CLIX vs VTI
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CLIX | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $6M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.53% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 30 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +0.61% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.52% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.55% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.82% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -73.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 14, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
CLIX vs VTI Performance
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CLIX returned +8.52% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, CLIX is up 0.61% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, CLIX compounded at +20.55% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -1.82% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +4.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CLIX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -73.2% for CLIX and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CLIX charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CLIX currently yields 0.53% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
CLIX and VTI share 13 holdings out of 2796 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CLIX or VTI?
CLIX has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CLIX or VTI?
Over the past year CLIX returned +8.52% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), CLIX annualized +4.96% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CLIX or VTI?
CLIX has been the more volatile fund at 24.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CLIX -73.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both CLIX and VTI?
CLIX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CLIX and VTI?
CLIX and VTI share 13 common holdings with a 3.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2796 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CLIX or VTI?
CLIX yields 0.53% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.