CNXT vs SCHD
VanEck ChiNext ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. CNXT delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CNXT | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $108M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.13% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 101 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +12.60% | +25.33% | |
| 1Y Return | +59.77% | +32.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.20% | +15.40% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.78% | +9.70% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 220.6% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.9% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 23, 2014 | Oct 20, 2011 |
CNXT vs SCHD Performance
VanEck ChiNext ETF (CNXT) is a ETF from VanEck and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year CNXT returned +59.77% while SCHD returned +32.31%. Year to date, CNXT is up 12.60% versus a gain of 25.33% for SCHD.
Over three years, CNXT compounded at +22.20% per year against +15.40% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +0.78% and +9.70% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.45% annualized vs +4.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CNXT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 220.6% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.9% for CNXT and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.02. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CNXT charges 0.65% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $6 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CNXT currently yields 0.13% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
CNXT and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 198 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CNXT or SCHD?
CNXT has an expense ratio of 0.65% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $59 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CNXT or SCHD?
Over the past year CNXT returned +59.77% vs +32.31% for SCHD, so CNXT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), CNXT annualized +4.49% vs +11.45% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CNXT or SCHD?
CNXT has been the more volatile fund at 220.6% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: CNXT -99.9% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both CNXT and SCHD?
CNXT and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of -0.02, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CNXT and SCHD?
CNXT and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 198 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CNXT or SCHD?
CNXT yields 0.13% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.