CNXT vs VXUS
VanEck ChiNext ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CNXT | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $104M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.17% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 98 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +7.44% | +13.91% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.94% | +25.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.78% | +19.76% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.83% | +8.82% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 220.2% | 15.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 23, 2014 | Jan 26, 2011 |
CNXT vs VXUS Performance
VanEck ChiNext ETF (CNXT) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CNXT returned +24.94% while VXUS returned +25.90%. Year to date, CNXT is up 7.44% versus a gain of 13.91% for VXUS.
Over three years, CNXT compounded at +21.78% per year against +19.76% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +0.83% and +8.82% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.80% annualized vs +4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CNXT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 220.2% compared with 15.0% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.9% for CNXT and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.01. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CNXT charges 0.65% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $5 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CNXT currently yields 0.17% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
CNXT and VXUS share 89 holdings out of 8102 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CNXT or VXUS?
CNXT has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $60 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CNXT or VXUS?
Over the past year CNXT returned +24.94% vs +25.90% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), CNXT annualized +4.30% vs +4.80% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CNXT or VXUS?
CNXT has been the more volatile fund at 220.2% annualized versus 15.0% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: CNXT -99.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both CNXT and VXUS?
CNXT and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.01, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CNXT and VXUS?
CNXT and VXUS share 89 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8102 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CNXT or VXUS?
CNXT yields 0.17% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.