CNXT vs VOO
VanEck ChiNext ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. CNXT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CNXT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $104M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.17% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 98 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +7.44% | +12.13% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.94% | +20.36% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.78% | +20.90% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.83% | +12.59% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 220.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 23, 2014 | Sep 7, 2010 |
CNXT vs VOO Performance
VanEck ChiNext ETF (CNXT) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CNXT returned +24.94% while VOO returned +20.36%. Year to date, CNXT is up 7.44% versus a gain of 12.13% for VOO.
Over three years, CNXT compounded at +21.78% per year against +20.90% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +0.83% and +12.59% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.41% annualized vs +4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CNXT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 220.2% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.9% for CNXT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.01. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CNXT charges 0.65% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CNXT currently yields 0.17% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
CNXT and VOO share 0 holdings out of 602 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CNXT or VOO?
CNXT has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CNXT or VOO?
Over the past year CNXT returned +24.94% vs +20.36% for VOO, so CNXT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), CNXT annualized +4.30% vs +13.41% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CNXT or VOO?
CNXT has been the more volatile fund at 220.2% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: CNXT -99.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both CNXT and VOO?
CNXT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.01, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CNXT and VOO?
CNXT and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 602 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CNXT or VOO?
CNXT yields 0.17% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.