CNXT vs VOO
VanEck ChiNext ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. CNXT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CNXT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $108M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.13% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 101 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +12.60% | +13.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +59.77% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.20% | +21.78% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.78% | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 220.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 23, 2014 | Sep 7, 2010 |
CNXT vs VOO Performance
VanEck ChiNext ETF (CNXT) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CNXT returned +59.77% while VOO returned +23.01%. Year to date, CNXT is up 12.60% versus a gain of 13.79% for VOO.
Over three years, CNXT compounded at +22.20% per year against +21.78% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +0.78% and +13.39% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.57% annualized vs +4.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CNXT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 220.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.9% for CNXT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.01. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CNXT charges 0.65% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CNXT currently yields 0.13% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
CNXT and VOO share 0 holdings out of 603 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CNXT or VOO?
CNXT has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CNXT or VOO?
Over the past year CNXT returned +59.77% vs +23.01% for VOO, so CNXT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), CNXT annualized +4.49% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CNXT or VOO?
CNXT has been the more volatile fund at 220.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: CNXT -99.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both CNXT and VOO?
CNXT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.01, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CNXT and VOO?
CNXT and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 603 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CNXT or VOO?
CNXT yields 0.13% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.