CNXT vs VTI
VanEck ChiNext ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CNXT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CNXT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $108M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.13% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 101 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +15.84% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +60.48% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.66% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.63% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 220.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 23, 2014 | May 24, 2001 |
CNXT vs VTI Performance
VanEck ChiNext ETF (CNXT) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CNXT returned +60.48% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, CNXT is up 15.84% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, CNXT compounded at +23.66% per year against +21.27% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +1.63% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs +4.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CNXT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 220.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.9% for CNXT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.10. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CNXT charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CNXT currently yields 0.13% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
CNXT and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2881 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CNXT or VTI?
CNXT has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CNXT or VTI?
Over the past year CNXT returned +60.48% vs +22.19% for VTI, so CNXT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), CNXT annualized +4.59% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CNXT or VTI?
CNXT has been the more volatile fund at 220.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CNXT -99.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both CNXT and VTI?
CNXT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.10, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CNXT and VTI?
CNXT and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2881 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CNXT or VTI?
CNXT yields 0.13% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.