COM vs QQQ
COM vs QQQ
Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | COM | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $205M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.60% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 16 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +15.62% | +18.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.50% | +27.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.88% | +25.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.25% | +15.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.7% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 30, 2017 | Mar 10, 1999 |
COM vs QQQ Performance
Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year COM returned +25.50% while QQQ returned +27.63%. Year to date, COM is up 15.62% versus a gain of 18.20% for QQQ.
Over three years, COM compounded at +7.88% per year against +25.54% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +8.25% and +15.12% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.11% annualized vs +6.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 8.7% for COM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for COM and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.11. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
COM charges 0.72% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $18 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, COM currently yields 2.60% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
COM and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 104 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, COM or QQQ?
COM has an expense ratio of 0.72% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $54 per year of difference.
Which performed better, COM or QQQ?
Over the past year COM returned +25.50% vs +27.63% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), COM annualized +6.51% vs +13.11% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, COM or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 8.7% for COM. Worst drawdown: COM -18.8% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both COM and QQQ?
COM and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.11, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between COM and QQQ?
COM and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 104 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, COM or QQQ?
COM yields 2.60% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so COM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.