COM vs VXUS
COM vs VXUS
Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | COM | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $205M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.60% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 16 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +15.62% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.50% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.88% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.25% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 30, 2017 | Jan 26, 2011 |
COM vs VXUS Performance
Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year COM returned +25.50% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, COM is up 15.62% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, COM compounded at +7.88% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +8.25% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, COM has the edge at +6.51% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 8.7% for COM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for COM and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.30. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
COM charges 0.72% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $5 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, COM currently yields 2.60% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
COM and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7862 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, COM or VXUS?
COM has an expense ratio of 0.72% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, COM or VXUS?
Over the past year COM returned +25.50% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), COM annualized +6.51% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, COM or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 8.7% for COM. Worst drawdown: COM -18.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both COM and VXUS?
COM and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.30, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between COM and VXUS?
COM and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7862 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, COM or VXUS?
COM yields 2.60% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so COM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.