COM vs VOO
COM vs VOO
Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. COM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | COM | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $205M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.60% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 16 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +15.62% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.50% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.88% | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.25% | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.7% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 30, 2017 | Sep 7, 2010 |
COM vs VOO Performance
Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year COM returned +25.50% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, COM is up 15.62% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Over three years, COM compounded at +7.88% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.25% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +6.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 8.7% for COM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for COM and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.21. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
COM charges 0.72% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $3 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, COM currently yields 2.60% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
COM and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, COM or VOO?
COM has an expense ratio of 0.72% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $69 per year of difference.
Which performed better, COM or VOO?
Over the past year COM returned +25.50% vs +23.71% for VOO, so COM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), COM annualized +6.51% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, COM or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 8.7% for COM. Worst drawdown: COM -18.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both COM and VOO?
COM and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.21, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between COM and VOO?
COM and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, COM or VOO?
COM yields 2.60% while VOO yields 1.09%, so COM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.