COM vs VTI
COM vs VTI
Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. COM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | COM | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $205M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.60% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 16 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +15.62% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.50% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.88% | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.25% | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 30, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
COM vs VTI Performance
Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year COM returned +25.50% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, COM is up 15.62% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Over three years, COM compounded at +7.88% per year against +21.12% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.25% and +12.37% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs +6.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 8.7% for COM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for COM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.21. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
COM charges 0.72% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $3 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, COM currently yields 2.60% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
COM and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, COM or VTI?
COM has an expense ratio of 0.72% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $69 per year of difference.
Which performed better, COM or VTI?
Over the past year COM returned +25.50% vs +24.16% for VTI, so COM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), COM annualized +6.51% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, COM or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 8.7% for COM. Worst drawdown: COM -18.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both COM and VTI?
COM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.21, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between COM and VTI?
COM and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, COM or VTI?
COM yields 2.60% while VTI yields 1.07%, so COM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.