COMB vs IVV
GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. COMB delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | COMB | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $147M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.94% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 29 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +21.50% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.22% | +23.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.90% | +21.49% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.51% | +13.43% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 19, 2017 | May 15, 2000 |
COMB vs IVV Performance
GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) is a ETF from GraniteShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year COMB returned +34.22% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, COMB is up 21.50% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, COMB compounded at +11.90% per year against +21.49% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +10.51% and +13.43% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, COMB has the edge at +7.17% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.5% for COMB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.5% for COMB and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.36. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
COMB charges 0.25% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, COMB currently yields 7.94% against 1.09% for IVV.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, COMB or IVV?
COMB has an expense ratio of 0.25% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, COMB or IVV?
Over the past year COMB returned +34.22% vs +23.70% for IVV, so COMB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), COMB annualized +7.17% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, COMB or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.5% for COMB. Worst drawdown: COMB -33.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both COMB and IVV?
COMB and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.36, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, COMB or IVV?
COMB yields 7.94% while IVV yields 1.09%, so COMB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.