COMB vs VOO
COMB vs VOO
GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. COMB delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | COMB | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $147M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.94% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 29 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +21.50% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.22% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.90% | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.51% | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 19, 2017 | Sep 7, 2010 |
COMB vs VOO Performance
GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year COMB returned +34.22% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, COMB is up 21.50% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Over three years, COMB compounded at +11.90% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +10.51% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +7.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
COMB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.5% for COMB and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
COMB charges 0.25% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, COMB currently yields 7.94% against 1.09% for VOO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, COMB or VOO?
COMB has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, COMB or VOO?
Over the past year COMB returned +34.22% vs +23.71% for VOO, so COMB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), COMB annualized +7.17% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, COMB or VOO?
COMB has been the more volatile fund at 14.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: COMB -33.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both COMB and VOO?
COMB and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, COMB or VOO?
COMB yields 7.94% while VOO yields 1.09%, so COMB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.