COMB vs VYM
COMB vs VYM
GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. COMB delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | COMB | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $147M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.94% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 29 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +21.50% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.22% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.90% | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.51% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.5% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 19, 2017 | Nov 10, 2006 |
COMB vs VYM Performance
GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year COMB returned +34.22% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, COMB is up 21.50% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Over three years, COMB compounded at +11.90% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +10.51% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, COMB has the edge at +7.17% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 14.5% for COMB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.5% for COMB and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
COMB charges 0.25% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $4 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, COMB currently yields 7.94% against 2.86% for VYM.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, COMB or VYM?
COMB has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $21 per year of difference.
Which performed better, COMB or VYM?
Over the past year COMB returned +34.22% vs +26.12% for VYM, so COMB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), COMB annualized +7.17% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, COMB or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 14.5% for COMB. Worst drawdown: COMB -33.5% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both COMB and VYM?
COMB and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, COMB or VYM?
COMB yields 7.94% while VYM yields 2.86%, so COMB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.