COMB vs QQQ
GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. COMB delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | COMB | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $147M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.94% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 29 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +21.50% | +18.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.22% | +27.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.90% | +25.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.51% | +15.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.5% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 19, 2017 | Mar 10, 1999 |
COMB vs QQQ Performance
GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year COMB returned +34.22% while QQQ returned +27.63%. Year to date, COMB is up 21.50% versus a gain of 18.20% for QQQ.
Over three years, COMB compounded at +11.90% per year against +25.54% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +10.51% and +15.12% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.11% annualized vs +7.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 14.5% for COMB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.5% for COMB and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.20. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
COMB charges 0.25% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $18 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, COMB currently yields 7.94% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, COMB or QQQ?
COMB has an expense ratio of 0.25% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $7 per year of difference.
Which performed better, COMB or QQQ?
Over the past year COMB returned +34.22% vs +27.63% for QQQ, so COMB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), COMB annualized +7.17% vs +13.11% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, COMB or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 14.5% for COMB. Worst drawdown: COMB -33.5% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both COMB and QQQ?
COMB and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.20, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, COMB or QQQ?
COMB yields 7.94% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so COMB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.