COMB vs QQQ

COMB vs QQQ

Which is better, COMB or QQQ?

Commodities against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. COMB led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCOMBQQQ
Expense Ratio0.25%0.18%Best
AUM$159M$483.5B
Dividend Yield6.88%0.44%
Holdings28107
YTD Return+34.94%Best+21.18%
1Y Return+44.27%Best+24.36%
3Y Return (annualized)+15.66%+27.99%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+11.67%+15.39%Best
Volatility (annualized)14.6%Best19.6%
Max Drawdown-33.5%Best-35.1%
$10,000 over 5 years$17,365$20,457Best
Fund FamilyGraniteSharesInvesco (US)
CategoryCommodityEquity
StyleCommoditiesLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMay 19, 2017Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 24, 2017 to Sep 23, 2026 (9.3 years).

COMB vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.3 years both funds cover.

COMB vs QQQ Performance

GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) is an ETF from GraniteShares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year COMB returned +44.27% while QQQ returned +24.36%. Year to date, COMB is up 34.94% versus a gain of 21.18% for QQQ.

Over three years, COMB compounded at +15.66% per year against +27.99% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +11.67% and +15.39% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +19.99% annualized vs +8.28%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.6% compared with 14.6% for COMB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.5% for COMB and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.21. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

COMB charges 0.25% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $18 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, COMB currently yields 6.88% against 0.44% for QQQ.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of COMB and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

COMBQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, COMB or QQQ?

COMB has an expense ratio of 0.25% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, COMB or QQQ?

Over the past year COMB returned +44.27% vs +24.36% for QQQ, so COMB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), COMB annualized +8.28% vs +19.99% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, COMB or QQQ?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 19.6% annualized versus 14.6% for COMB. Worst drawdown: COMB -33.5% vs QQQ -35.1%.

Should I hold both COMB and QQQ?

COMB and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.21, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, COMB or QQQ?

COMB yields 6.88% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so COMB currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than COMB?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. COMB led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.