COOL vs IVV
VegaShares AI Thermal, Cooling & Power Management ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, COOL or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. COOL led over 3Y and 5Y, IVV over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | COOL | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $521,115.29 | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 13 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -4.51% | +11.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | -4.51% | +15.96%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.12%Best | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.87%Best | +12.66% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 47.7% | 15.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -10.9%Best | -24.5% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $20,000Best | $18,149 |
| Fund Family | VegaShares ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 13, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 19, 2021 to Sep 15, 2026 (5.6 years).
COOL vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.6 years both funds cover.
COOL vs IVV Performance
VegaShares AI Thermal, Cooling & Power Management ETF (COOL) is an ETF from VegaShares ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year COOL returned -4.51% while IVV returned +15.96%. Year to date, COOL is down 4.51% versus a gain of 11.51% for IVV.
Over three years, COOL compounded at +21.12% per year against +21.01% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +14.87% and +12.66% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.24% annualized vs +12.32%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
COOL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 47.7% compared with 15.3% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.9% for COOL and -24.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.05. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
COOL charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, COOL currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.3% of IVV's money is in holdings COOL also owns.
Stated as a floor: for COOL, our book for it covers 57.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
3 positions in common, counted across the 13 positions we hold weights for in COOL and 490 in IVV, against full books of 13 and 508.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of COOL and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, COOL or IVV?
COOL has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, COOL or IVV?
Over the past year COOL returned -4.51% vs +15.96% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), COOL annualized +12.32% vs +14.24% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, COOL or IVV?
COOL has been the more volatile fund at 47.7% annualized versus 15.3% for IVV. Worst drawdown: COOL -10.9% vs IVV -24.5%.
Should I hold both COOL and IVV?
COOL and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.05, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, COOL or IVV?
COOL yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than COOL?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. COOL led over 3Y and 5Y, IVV over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.