COSW vs VXUS
Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, COSW or VXUS?
VXUS has been ahead.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | COSW | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $10M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 25.48% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 5 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | -6.21% | +12.88%Best |
| 1Y Return | -17.12% | +19.97%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.14% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.87% |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
COSW vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
COSW vs VXUS Performance
Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) is an ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year COSW returned -17.12% while VXUS returned +19.97%. Year to date, COSW is down 6.21% versus a gain of 12.88% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
COSW charges 0.99% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $5 annually, a gap of $94 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, COSW currently yields 25.48% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in COSW and 8,082 in VXUS, totalling 12.2% and 88.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in COSW and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 5 and 8,747.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of COSW and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, COSW or VXUS?
COSW has an expense ratio of 0.99% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $94 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, COSW or VXUS?
Over the past year COSW returned -17.12% vs +19.97% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, COSW or VXUS?
COSW yields 25.48% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so COSW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than COSW?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.