CRPT vs QQQ
First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry and Digital Economy ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CRPT | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $83M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.01% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 20 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -10.86% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | -31.55% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +39.00% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -5.25% | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 75.5% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -88.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
CRPT vs QQQ Performance
First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry and Digital Economy ETF (CRPT) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CRPT returned -31.55% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, CRPT is down 10.86% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, CRPT compounded at +39.00% per year against +25.96% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -5.25% and +14.54% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs -5.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CRPT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 75.5% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.3% for CRPT and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CRPT charges 0.85% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $18 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CRPT currently yields 1.01% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
CRPT and QQQ share 1 holdings out of 120 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CRPT | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSTR | 21.24% | 0.14% | 21.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CRPT or QQQ?
CRPT has an expense ratio of 0.85% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CRPT or QQQ?
Over the past year CRPT returned -31.55% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), CRPT annualized -5.25% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CRPT or QQQ?
CRPT has been the more volatile fund at 75.5% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: CRPT -88.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both CRPT and QQQ?
CRPT and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CRPT and QQQ?
CRPT and QQQ share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 120 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CRPT or QQQ?
CRPT yields 1.01% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so CRPT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.