CRPT vs IVV
First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry and Digital Economy ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CRPT | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $83M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.01% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 20 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -10.86% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | -31.55% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +39.00% | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -5.25% | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 75.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -88.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
CRPT vs IVV Performance
First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry and Digital Economy ETF (CRPT) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CRPT returned -31.55% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, CRPT is down 10.86% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Over three years, CRPT compounded at +39.00% per year against +22.08% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -5.25% and +12.96% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.00% annualized vs -5.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CRPT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 75.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.3% for CRPT and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CRPT charges 0.85% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CRPT currently yields 1.01% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
CRPT and IVV share 2 holdings out of 522 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CRPT or IVV?
CRPT has an expense ratio of 0.85% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CRPT or IVV?
Over the past year CRPT returned -31.55% vs +21.89% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), CRPT annualized -5.25% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CRPT or IVV?
CRPT has been the more volatile fund at 75.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: CRPT -88.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both CRPT and IVV?
CRPT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CRPT and IVV?
CRPT and IVV share 2 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 522 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CRPT or IVV?
CRPT yields 1.01% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.