CRWL vs IVV
GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. CRWL delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CRWL | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $61M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +170.11% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +171.99% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 137.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -65.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 11, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
CRWL vs IVV Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF (CRWL) is a ETF from GraniteShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CRWL returned +171.99% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, CRWL is up 170.11% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CRWL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 137.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -65.0% for CRWL and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CRWL charges 1.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $3 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CRWL currently yields 0.00% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
CRWL and IVV share 1 holdings out of 505 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CRWL | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRWD | 66.66% | 0.30% | 66.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CRWL or IVV?
CRWL has an expense ratio of 1.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $147 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CRWL or IVV?
Over the past year CRWL returned +171.99% vs +21.79% for IVV, so CRWL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CRWL annualized +90.50% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CRWL or IVV?
CRWL has been the more volatile fund at 137.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: CRWL -65.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both CRWL and IVV?
CRWL and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CRWL and IVV?
CRWL and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 505 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CRWL or IVV?
CRWL yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.