CRWL vs SCHD
GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. CRWL delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CRWL | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $38M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +182.45% | +25.58% | |
| 1Y Return | +170.40% | +31.06% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.61% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 138.4% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -65.0% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 11, 2024 | Oct 20, 2011 |
CRWL vs SCHD Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF (CRWL) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year CRWL returned +170.40% while SCHD returned +31.06%. Year to date, CRWL is up 182.45% versus a gain of 25.58% for SCHD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CRWL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 138.4% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -65.0% for CRWL and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.18. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CRWL charges 1.50% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $6 annually, a gap of $144 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CRWL currently yields 0.00% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
CRWL and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 101 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CRWL or SCHD?
CRWL has an expense ratio of 1.50% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $144 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CRWL or SCHD?
Over the past year CRWL returned +170.40% vs +31.06% for SCHD, so CRWL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CRWL annualized +95.83% vs +11.46% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CRWL or SCHD?
CRWL has been the more volatile fund at 138.4% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: CRWL -65.0% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both CRWL and SCHD?
CRWL and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of -0.18, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CRWL and SCHD?
CRWL and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 101 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CRWL or SCHD?
CRWL yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.