CRWL vs VTI
GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CRWL delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CRWL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $61M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +109.72% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +123.70% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 137.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -65.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 11, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
CRWL vs VTI Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF (CRWL) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CRWL returned +123.70% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, CRWL is up 109.72% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CRWL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 137.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -65.0% for CRWL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CRWL charges 1.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $3 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CRWL currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
CRWL and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2787 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CRWL | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRWD | 66.66% | 0.25% | 66.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CRWL or VTI?
CRWL has an expense ratio of 1.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $147 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CRWL or VTI?
Over the past year CRWL returned +123.70% vs +22.35% for VTI, so CRWL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CRWL annualized +63.99% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CRWL or VTI?
CRWL has been the more volatile fund at 137.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CRWL -65.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both CRWL and VTI?
CRWL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CRWL and VTI?
CRWL and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2787 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CRWL or VTI?
CRWL yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.