CRWL vs QQQ
GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. CRWL delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CRWL | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $61M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +109.72% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +123.70% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 137.6% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -65.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 11, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
CRWL vs QQQ Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF (CRWL) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CRWL returned +123.70% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, CRWL is up 109.72% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CRWL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 137.6% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -65.0% for CRWL and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CRWL charges 1.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $18 annually, a gap of $132 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CRWL currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
CRWL and QQQ share 1 holdings out of 102 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CRWL | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRWD | 66.66% | 0.94% | 65.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CRWL or QQQ?
CRWL has an expense ratio of 1.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $132 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CRWL or QQQ?
Over the past year CRWL returned +123.70% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so CRWL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CRWL annualized +63.99% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CRWL or QQQ?
CRWL has been the more volatile fund at 137.6% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: CRWL -65.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both CRWL and QQQ?
CRWL and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CRWL and QQQ?
CRWL and QQQ share 1 common holdings with a 0.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 102 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CRWL or QQQ?
CRWL yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.