CSB vs QQQ
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Weighted ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CSB | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $264M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.03% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 102 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +15.68% | +16.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.90% | +26.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.13% | +25.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.09% | +14.78% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -43.7% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 7, 2015 | Mar 10, 1999 |
CSB vs QQQ Performance
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Weighted ETF (CSB) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CSB returned +19.90% while QQQ returned +26.23%. Year to date, CSB is up 15.68% versus a gain of 16.23% for QQQ.
Over three years, CSB compounded at +13.13% per year against +25.75% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +6.09% and +14.78% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.02% annualized vs +7.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 18.9% for CSB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.7% for CSB and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CSB charges 0.35% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $18 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSB currently yields 3.03% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
CSB and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 202 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CSB or QQQ?
CSB has an expense ratio of 0.35% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CSB or QQQ?
Over the past year CSB returned +19.90% vs +26.23% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), CSB annualized +7.93% vs +13.02% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CSB or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 18.9% for CSB. Worst drawdown: CSB -43.7% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both CSB and QQQ?
CSB and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CSB and QQQ?
CSB and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 202 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CSB or QQQ?
CSB yields 3.03% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so CSB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.