CSB vs QQQ
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Weighted ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, CSB or QQQ?
Small Cap Value against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. CSB is less concentrated, with 15.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CSB | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $258M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.03% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 102 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +11.38% | +15.86%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.30% | +22.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.39% | +24.15%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.62% | +14.16%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.9%Tie | 18.9%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -43.7% | -35.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,144 | $19,390Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 15.7%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 7, 2015 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 8, 2015 to Sep 10, 2026 (11.2 years).
CSB vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.2 years both funds cover.
CSB vs QQQ Performance
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Weighted ETF (CSB) is an ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CSB returned +12.30% while QQQ returned +22.63%. Year to date, CSB is up 11.38% versus a gain of 15.86% for QQQ.
Over three years, CSB compounded at +12.39% per year against +24.15% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +5.62% and +14.16% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +18.87% annualized vs +7.52%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CSB and QQQ have been equally volatile, both at 18.9% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.7% for CSB and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CSB charges 0.35% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $18 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSB currently yields 3.03% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 100 holdings in CSB and 102 in QQQ, totalling 99.6% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in CSB and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 102 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 95 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for CSB (97.0% of the fund), and 99 for CSB that do not appear in QQQ (98.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CSB and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CSB or QQQ?
CSB has an expense ratio of 0.35% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CSB or QQQ?
Over the past year CSB returned +12.30% vs +22.63% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), CSB annualized +7.52% vs +18.87% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CSB or QQQ?
CSB and QQQ have been equally volatile, both at 18.9% annualized. Worst drawdown: CSB -43.7% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both CSB and QQQ?
CSB and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CSB or QQQ?
CSB yields 3.03% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so CSB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than CSB?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. CSB is less concentrated, with 15.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.