CSEN vs IVV

CSEN vs IVV

Which is better, CSEN or IVV?

Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. CSEN led over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.4%.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns (1Y): CSENLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCSENIVV
Expense Ratio0.80%0.03%Best
AUM$200M$876.4B
Dividend Yield0.34%1.06%
Holdings40508
YTD Return+2.71%+13.85%Best
1Y Return-+18.57%
3Y Return (annualized)-+23.50%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.34%
Top 10 Weight57.4%37.8%Best
Fund FamilyCohen & Steers FundsiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 15, 2026May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

CSEN vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

CSEN vs IVV Performance

Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF (CSEN) is an ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, CSEN is up 2.71% versus a gain of 13.85% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CSEN charges 0.80% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $3 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSEN currently yields 0.34% against 1.06% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

CSEN already in IVV50.8%
IVV already in CSEN2.0%

50.8% of CSEN's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 2.0% of IVV's money is in holdings CSEN also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

9 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in CSEN and 490 in IVV, against full books of 40 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 473 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for CSEN (96.6% of the fund), and 17 for CSEN that do not appear in IVV (24.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CSENWeight in IVVDifference
XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd8.90%1.01%7.89%
COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.016.66%0.24%6.42%
PSXPhillips 666.58%0.15%6.43%
VLOValero Energy6.42%0.16%6.26%
SLBSchlumberger Nv.5.97%0.14%5.83%
WMBWilliams Cos. Inc.4.66%0.14%4.52%
DVNDevon Energy Corporation4.64%0.08%4.56%
FSLRFirst Solar, Inc3.70%0.03%3.67%
TRGPTarga Resources Partners Lp/targa Resources Partners Finance Corp.3.28%0.10%3.18%

50.8% of CSEN is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

CSENIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CSEN or IVV?

CSEN has an expense ratio of 0.80% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $77 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between CSEN and IVV?

50.8% of CSEN's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 2.0% of IVV's is in holdings CSEN also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in CSEN and 490 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, CSEN or IVV?

CSEN yields 0.34% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than CSEN?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. CSEN led over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.