CSRA vs QQQ
Cohen & Steers Real Assets Active ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, CSRA or QQQ?
Allocation/Balanced against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 47.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CSRA | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $19M | $498.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 190 | 321 |
| YTD Return | -2.35% | +22.67%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +24.33% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +29.05% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.00% |
| Top 10 Weight | 50.5% | 47.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Cohen & Steers Funds | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Allocation/Balanced | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Aug 11, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
CSRA vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CSRA vs QQQ Performance
Cohen & Steers Real Assets Active ETF (CSRA) is an ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, CSRA is down 2.35% versus a gain of 22.67% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CSRA charges 0.80% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $18 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSRA currently yields 0.00% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
0.6% of CSRA's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 1.1% of QQQ's money is in holdings CSRA also owns.
QQQ and CSRA share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 190 positions we hold weights for in CSRA and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 190 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 93 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for CSRA (96.8% of the fund), and 85 for CSRA that do not appear in QQQ (73.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CSRA and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CSRA or QQQ?
CSRA has an expense ratio of 0.80% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between CSRA and QQQ?
1.1% of QQQ's money is in holdings CSRA also owns. 1.1% of QQQ's is in holdings CSRA also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 190 positions we hold weights for in CSRA and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, CSRA or QQQ?
CSRA yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than CSRA?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 47.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.